We are Filip and Juraj Koščák, nephew and uncle, a builder and a scientist. We started this lab because we were tired of AI that sounds certain and is quietly wrong. Everything we make follows one rule: measure it, or don't claim it.A two-person lab across ML engineering and stochastic-learning research. Every system ships under one constraint: verified against held-out reality, or it abstains. No cherry-picking, no confident bluffing.
One rule across every program: measure it on real hardware, or don't claim it.88+ logged runs · identical A100 / H200 configs · exact-or-abstain reporting across the lab
Built on
We are Filip and Dr. Juraj Koščák, nephew and uncle. One of us spent fifteen years turning stochastic learning into published science; the other builds the systems and runs them on real hardware until the numbers actually hold.A two-person lab: a stochastic-learning researcher (PhD, TUKE, Sinčák lineage) and a builder-engineer who runs the compute path end to end on real A100 and H200 silicon.
We started this lab for one reason: the most impressive-sounding AI is often the most confidently wrong. So we build the opposite, systems that would rather say "I don't know" than guess, and that prove every claim against reality before we publish it.Our thesis is verify-or-abstain: a system should quantify what it cannot know and refuse to answer there, rather than emit a fluent hallucination. Every result ships with held-out evidence.
Everything on this page, across every program, follows the same rule: measure it, or don't claim it.One methodology across programs: controlled runs, held-out verification, exact-or-abstain reporting, reproducible logs.
Six projects. Every one of them you can try, check or read today. If a number is on this page, we measured it ourselves.Each entry links to its evidence surface. Held-out verified; limits stated, not hidden.
Ask it anything. If it can prove the answer, you get it with the working shown. If it can't, it tells you honestly instead of making something up. It's running live right now, and it has never lied once.Recovers power laws (Kepler), ODE systems (logistic, damped oscillator) and chaotic dynamics via sparse regression (Lotka-Volterra, Lorenz). Exact-or-abstain, held-out verified.
Try NOESIS liveQuery the engine →
Most AI training quietly memorises its examples. Ours memorised 33 times less while staying just as capable, measured across 88+ runs on real datacenter GPUs.Gap 0.5329 to 0.0160 (33.3x), FP8 degradation 5.2% vs 68.2%, κ = -0.009. 88+ runs, 5 seeds, p<0.0001.
See the benchmarkView methodology →
Instead of always handing you a number, it tells you how much to trust it. A frost warning for your field or rain for your weekend, with the honesty built in.Same verify-or-abstain discipline applied to short-horizon forecasting: predict where the signal supports it, abstain where it doesn't.
Try the forecastSee the forecast →
Run a free scan of a site you own. We look at it the way a real attacker would, then explain what we found in plain language you can act on.Web, API and LLM attack-surface research with the lab's exact-or-abstain reporting: findings are reproducible or they don't ship.
Try the free scanSee the scope →
Astronomers have maps of millions of galaxies. We let NOESIS search them for patterns without telling it what to find, and it only reports what survives checking.Large-scale-structure analysis (DESI-class) via the same sparse-recovery method, held-out validated before any claim.
See the sky projectOpen the audit →Every result on this site links to how we measured it. When something didn't work, we say so. Read it like a lab notebook, because that's what it is.Methods, run evidence and negative results in public. Every headline number traces to a logged run.
Read the notebookRead the notes →
Ask it anything. If it doesn't know, it doesn't guess: it goes and learns from real sources, checks that it's true, and only then tells you. It stays silent only when something genuinely can't be known.A deterministic engine with a hard abstain boundary: blind structure recovery, sourced lookups, and held-out verification before any answer ships. Zero bluffed answers by construction.

KSS-LoRA is a fine-tuning method born from 15 years of Slovak stochastic-learning research. It closed the memorisation gap 33 times over, and it stays stable where the standard method falls apart.Stochastic sparse LoRA with the Koščák Gamma stability constraint: gap 0.5329 to 0.0160, κ = -0.009, FP8 degradation 5.2% vs 68.2% for standard LoRA.

The world's forecast systems predict a 6-13 km grid box. We predict your exact spot, and on the ground we beat operational ICON, GFS and ECMWF on the variables that pay. From one station, on a Raspberry Pi, on nine years of real data.Station-level post-processing that outperforms operational ICON, GFS and ECMWF on held-out 2026 data; every number measured, nothing simulated. Same verify-or-abstain gate as the rest of the lab.

Most audits run a scanner, paste the output into a PDF, and charge five figures. Nobody tests what happens when those findings are chained together. We do, with the same rule as the rest of the lab: reproducible, or it doesn't ship.Web, API and LLM attack-surface testing that starts from scanner output and chains findings into real attack paths. Exact-or-abstain reporting: every finding reproducible, severity backed by a working chain.

The same engine that finds the law behind a handful of numbers, pointed at the largest dataset there is: the sky. No assumed answers, no cherry-picked signals, structure has to survive held-out validation before we call it structure.A calibrated consistency audit for DESI-class BAO data releases: blind structure recovery over large-scale-structure data, held-out validated, abstaining where the signal does not support a claim.
The original scientist, the builder, and the communications layer needed to turn a result into a public research programme.Stochastic neural-network lineage, benchmark engineering, hardware validation, and publication discipline in one compact team.
PhD (Red Diploma, top distinction) in Computer Science from the Technical University of Košice, Department of Cybernetics & AI, under Prof. Peter Sinčák (founder of the Slovak Artificial Intelligence Society). Doctoral work 2010–2015 pioneered stochastic weight-update methods in neural networks: IEEE WCCI 2010, SCIS&ISIS 2014 (Japan), and the monograph Stochastic Weight Update in Neural Networks (ISBN 3659231029). KSS-LoRA is the direct descendant: the same stochastic-masking principle, transplanted into modern LLM fine-tuning and extended with the Koščák Gamma Theorem, an original result for FP8/FP4 numerical stability.
Builder and research architect, and Juraj's nephew. Filip runs the lab's engineering end to end: the compute path on real A100 and H200 hardware, the benchmark pipeline behind the 33× result, and the systems that ship. He has the rare ability to see the signal before the data confirms it, and the discipline to prove it before claiming it. A music producer (known on stage as Phauler) turned AI engineer, he cares as much about the craft of the work as the result.
Laura shapes how KSS-LoRA is seen, and remembered. Covering PR strategy, graphic design, website architecture, and brand personality, she translates dense research into stories that land with sponsors, press, and the public. Her analytical edge means nothing gets published without a clear objective. The reason koscak.ai looks this good.
No big lab behind us, no ad model, no strings. Backing goes straight into compute and hardware so the next result gets measured properly, in the open.Every euro funds GPU time and research hardware. Runs stay reproducible; findings stay public.
We answer every serious message ourselves. No funnel, no bots, just the two people who built this.Direct line to the authors. Bring a dataset, a GPU cluster, or a hard question.
Get in touchEmail the lab DM Filip on XReach out on XThe hardware and model families behind the lab's results.A100 and H200 are validated; Blackwell-class FP4 is the next validation surface.
Primary cross-validation GPU. FP8 native. 4.8 TB/s HBM3e. 2.7× faster than A100 for KSS-LoRA workloads.
Next validation target. 288GB HBM3e · 8 TB/s · FP4-class path. Public claims wait for reproducible logs.
72-GPU NVLink rack. FP4 native. Koščák Gamma Theorem proves γ_min=1.0, KSS-LoRA satisfies this by design.
Primary fine-tuning target. TruthfulQA benchmark. 12 baseline + 40 KSS runs across A100 and H200.
Cross-model validation target. Confirms hardware-agnostic generalization of KSS-LoRA across model families.
The precision format that exposes standard LoRA's gradient underflow. KSS-LoRA's result: 5.2% vs 68% quality loss.